上海千花网,爱上海,上海419论坛 – Powered by Gregary Thayne!

Innovation Nation Why has the government put a cap on innovation success

Posted on by

Canada has a rich history of innovation, but in the next few decades, powerful technological forces will transform the global economy. Large multinational companies have jumped out to a headstart in the race to succeed, and Canada runs the risk of falling behind. At stake is nothing less than our prosperity and economic well-being. The Financial Post set out explore what is needed for businesses to flourish and grow. You can find all of our coverage here.The recent statements about innovation coming from politicians in Ottawa are encouraging. On more than one occasion, Minister Navdeep Bains has said he would rather see 10 high-growth Canadian tech companies scale globally than 10 more foreign branch plants open their doors in Canada.Domestic innovators and innovation economists have long argued that to create quality jobs and prosperity, our country needs an ecosystem that enables our own high-growth anchor firms. The best returns to national economies, experts say, come from companies that generate value from intangibles like data and intellectual property — and that scale from $100 million to billions of dollars in revenue. These are the companies that provide critical public and private wealth, and that can help Canada generate the new revenues it desperately needs to fund social programs and public infrastructure across the country. Innovation Nation: Why CEOs support basic income Innovation Nation: How to boost adoption of AI — ethically Innovation Nation: What Canada’s cutting-edge health tech startups need to get to the next level Just look at the lasting impact of Research In Motion, now BlackBerry, where seasoned C-suite talent and private wealth have transformed Waterloo, Ont., from a rural farm town into a vibrant technology and research hub.The government’s recent Economic Strategy Table focused on digital industries concurred that anchor firms “play an important role in creating powerful business clusters and incubating other businesses. By virtue of their size and R&D spend, anchor firms help create new organizations and transform existing ones, fostering entrepreneurship and networking on local and global levels.” They also create local philanthropists, who invest in their communities and social infrastructure.But while experts agree anchor firms are critical to prosperity, Canada’s current public policy strategies are still heavily oriented towards pre-revenue startups. What’s worse, our current innovation programs stop supporting the very companies we need to double down on. As a result, only one per cent of companies reach the 100- to 499-employee mark in Canada.Take for instance the National Research Council’s (NRC) Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP). Most innovators would agree that IRAP is one of Canada’s more successful innovation programs. It allows the NRC to partner with Canadian companies on R&D projects. In the 2018 federal budget, the government increased the size of an individual IRAP matching contribution from $1 million to $10 million. Unfortunately, it did so while maintaining the rule that, to qualify for IRAP, applicants must have fewer than 500 employees — a puzzling requirement given stated promises about helping high-growth companies.The result is a program that fails to reach its potential because the companies with the scale needed to carry out $20-million R&D projects are barred from applying. As Canada’s fast-growing companies reach a pinnacle of success, they outgrow the very programs that helped them scale rapidly along the way — and are left to compete in the global economy on their own.Despite the hype about our tech sector, we should be concerned that fewer than five per cent of Canadian startups graduate to the scale-up stage, especially when we take stock of the time, capital and hands-on support governments give to early-stage companies. As a recent story by The Logic reported, some government programs prop up companies that are not viable and have no market traction. Rather than propping up “zombie” startups, Canada’s innovation programs need to help proven market winners continue scaling, including with access to strategic capital.If the goal is to have more global companies headquartered and anchored here in Canada, why has the government placed a cap on success?To scale a successful technology company in 2019, Canadian innovators need highly-skilled talent, capital and customers. All successful innovation economies exhibit a close working relationship between proven market-winning companies and their public sector, co-developing strategic economic policies and working hand-in-glove to address challenges impacting the growth of emerging industries. In a winner-take-all tech race, governments that help their domestic innovators scale-up and succeed are seeing the greatest economic dividends for their intervention. The same needs to happen in Canada.Lifting the employee cap on IRAP is a logical step the government should take to achieve their vision of more Canadian companies growing into the large anchor companies known around the world.Benjamin Bergen, executive director of the Council of Canadian Innovators. read more

Tagged: , , , , , .

THW Kiel won Super Globe 2011

Posted on by

Super Globe 2011THW Kiel ← Previous Story Doder stays in Minden! Next Story → Rajko Prodanovic one step to Pick Szeged After a thrilling final full of emotions THW Kiel is the new IHF Super Globe Champion, as Ciudad Real missed its hat-trick after winning the 2007 and 2010 titles.THW Kiel (GER) –Renovalia Ciudad Real (ESP) 28:25 (10:14)Tough, emotions, highest tension – the 2011 Super Globe final in Doha had all ingredients of a top-notch match. 3,200 spectators watched the match of two European teams representing world class. IHF President Dr Hassan Moustafa and Sheikh Jawaan bin Hamad Al Thani handed over the trophy to THW captain Marcus Ahlm, and the Germans celebrated their first ever Super Globe title.The match was on the edge during all the 60 minutes – and it was a game of two completely different halves. Ciudad Real was clearly predominant before the break and had managed a well-deserved four-goal margin. Kiel was weak in attack and had to thank outstanding goalkeeper Thierry Omeyer, who saved ten shots before the break. Despite his world-class performance Ciudad Real proved strong from the wing positions, and its goalkeeper Arpad Sterbik also saved brilliantly.But the match changed totally after the break: Kiel improved in both attack and defence. It took only seven minutes for Kiel to turn the game upside down from 10:15 to 17:15. But then the Germans were shocked for a short period: Due to a foul on Guardiola committed by World Handball Player of the Year Filip Jicha, Kiel’s player was sent off. Ciudad Real equalised again to 17:17 – the game was on the edge. Yet, Kiel kept calm as emotions became hot like the desert outside. Kiel’s captain Marcus Ahlm (THW top scorer with seven goals) assumed responsibility to lead his team to manage another three-goal margin. But Ciudad Real did not give up and fought hard for every ball.Then it was Omeyer again, who saved the title for Kiel in the final stage of the match. Thanks to his 17 saves in total he became the best goalkeeper of the tournament. Although Ciudad Real caught up to just one goal again, THW kept cool, and with Kim Andersson scoring to 28:25 in the final minute the game was over.While Ciudad Real missed its title hat-trick after winning the 2007 and 2010 titles, Kiel is the first German team in history to lift the trophy. And it was the sole title Kiel’s treasury of trophies had been missing, as it already claimed several European Cup title, two Champions League titles, 16 the German championship titles and seven German Cup titles. read more

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , .